Tag: Unifor

“Fact Check Here” – Is the National Post a “Legitimate News Outlet”?

Unifor has just launched a campaign that they call “Fact Check Here.” The campaign is supposed to counter “disinformation” and support efforts to “sort the lies from the truth.” That sounds like something we really need. But when I looked at the cartoon and video ads produced for the campaign I was taken aback.

The ads feature ordinary people at the water cooler in their office, or in their back yard. When someone expresses a questionable opinion a burly hockey player flies in and flattens them! “Why did you do that?” is answered with the tagline “I had to fact check you.” My question is – why are ordinary workers getting targeted and knocked to the ground, but not the sources of misinformation? The most powerful sources of disinformation in Canada are the corporate media conglomerates but the Fact Check Here campaign ignores their bias. Maybe that’s because they have endorsed (and funded?) the campaign.

Media bias against workers, people fighting for justice

Workers know that we never get fair treatment from the corporate media when we take on our employers or go on strike. We see over and over any criticism of a society dominated by billionaires is marginalized or censored. Most Canadians’ oppose the ongoing genocidal assault on Gaza by Israel, yet mainstream Canadian media provides unbalanced coverage that overwhelmingly supports Israel. Many journalists have complained about the restraints put on their coverage, including the “don’t say Palestine rule.” The corporate media maintains unanimity that public ownership is bad, that social services need to be cut back, and about who we should see as enemies in the world, and who should have economic sanctions imposed on them, (generally taking their cue from the US State Department).

Partners with Media Conglomerates?

Yet, astonishingly, the Unifor campaign does not call out the billionaire owners of our biased media. In fact, the Unifor campaign is done in partnership with them, and they are the ones who are defined as “legitimate news outlets.”

Who decides which news outlets are “legitimate”? Who owns these “legitimate” outlets, and what ideology do they promote? The vast majority of Canadian news sources, other than the CBC are owned by six corporations, mostly owned by multi-billion-dollar families: Rogers Media (owned by the Rogers family), Bell Media, Corus (Shaw family), Thomson-Reuters (Thomson family), Torstar, and Postmedia.

These corporations are committed to the class interests of their billionaire owners, not to the truth.

The Fact Check Now campaign lists affiliates of every one of these media conglomerates as partners (along with a few smaller online journals). They tell us “Credible News Can Be Found Here” and then list the Globe and Mail, CTV, Torstar and Postmedia. Does anyone really consider Postmedia, owner of the National Post, the Toronto Sun, and over 130 other media outlets to be “credible?” (Postmedia is owned by a US hedge fund with ties to the Republican Party.)

At the press conference announcing the launch of the campaign, one speaker was Paul Deegan, the CEO of News Media Canada, the organization of Canadian news corporations. Deegan said, “Real journalism costs real money. And if we can’t monetize that content, we cannot reinvest in accurate and authoritative journalism. (at 0:50 of the video)”

Lana Payne went so far as to say, ““We are pleased that so many employers of our members — large and small organizations — are standing with us.”

We should be asking questions when a union leader brags that employers are “standing with us” – questions like “Which side are you on?”

Media Blackout of Unifor Convention Support for Palestinians

Unifor has an additional very good reason to be skeptical of the motives of corporate media, since they were recently subject to a news blackout of their support for Palestinian rights. At the August 2025 Unifor convention, a resolution was adopted unanimously “to support Palestinian Trade Unions and Palestinian workers who are affected by the ongoing genocide”, and “endorse the call by Palestinian trade unions for an arms embargo on Israel.” In addition, Unifor’s Nelson Mandela Human Rights Award was presented at the Convention to the Palestinian Journalist’s Syndicate. These newsworthy events were not mentioned anywhere in a single mainstream media outlet.

Maria Ressa and the NED – US State Department and CIA News

The clearest indication that Unifor’s Fact Check Now campaign is supporting the wrong (class) side in the debate about “credible news” is that their statement is introduced with a quote from Maria Ressa. Ressa is chair of the “World Movement for Democracy”, which is controlled by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The NED is funded by the US Congress to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars annually, and operates to advance the interests of the US around the world, including promoting coups and regime change against governments they don’t like. NED founder Allen Weinstein once said: “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.” A large part of the activities of the NED and its arm, the World Movement for Democracy, involve using their resources  to influence and control news coverage under the direction of the US State Department. This is the opposite of fact checking.

We need pro-labour news

All news sources have a bias. Unions have a duty to workers to support media that is on our side, not against us. We can no more be partners with the owners of the National Post or the Globe and Mail, than we can be partners with the owners of GM or Stellantis. Our unions should be helping Canadian workers to understand how much of our media is owned by billionaires, and how that determines what news we receive. Journalists are workers who should be supported, including when they face pressure to amplify the views of the owners of the media outlets that employ them. We can support journalists without supporting their billionaire owners. Workers and capitalists have no interests in common, and our task is to support workers.

{ Add a Comment }

Tasks of the Working Class in the Trump Tariffs Crisis

March Theses

Tasks of the Working Class in the Trump Tariffs Crisis

GM workers from the US, Canada, and Brazil demonstrate against plant closings at the Detroit International Auto Show January 18, 2019
GM workers from the US, Canada, and Brazil demonstrated together against plant closings at the Detroit International Auto Show January 18, 2019
  1. The working class and the billionaire class do not have “common interests” in this crisis. Corporations that have tried to whipsaw workers in different countries for decades to maximize their profits are not looking out for our interests now. Likewise, workers cannot subordinate our interests to governments that have been quick to ban strikes, cut social programs, and to hand out billions of dollars of public funds to corporations that engage in extortion for jobs and investment. The working class has to develop our own program and our own demands and fight for our own class interests. Labour can’t play an independent role if we allow the federal government to choose which union leaders to put on councils, or if labour participates in CEO-led bodies in which they are vastly outnumbered by corporate representatives.
  2. Labour should go beyond resisting tariffs to demanding that we reduce our dependency on the US by implementing a new industrial strategy based on public ownership and Crown Corporations. As Linda McQuaig argued, high-speed rail “should be handled by a Crown corporation, rather than relying on public-private partnerships, which leave private businesses calling the shots, driving up the costs and controlling our key infrastructure.” Public ownership should be the mechanism for launching major projects for affordable housing, expanded public transit, a green transition that includes manufacturing electric vehicles for government fleets, expanded universal health care, and more. See statements by CUPE and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA).
  3. The Unifor Auto and Parts Councils have announced a policy to “urge the Federal and Provincial Governments to exercise their authority to stop the relocation of any machinery, equipment or other property purchased by automakers with public funds.” “We’ll never allow them to take away any machinery,” said Local 200 President John D’Agnolo. This is an important step in the right direction, but we need to go farther. The labour movement should demand measures to prevent the removal of equipment or shutdown of any productive facilities in Canada. Further, if corporations close down or abandon operations, we should call for government support to put them under public ownership or worker cooperative control where they could become a component of the industrial strategy we need.
  4. We are facing the threat of coercive annexation. Labour must demand that we remove ourselves from military alliances that put us under the command of the power that is threatening us. Canada should exit NATO and the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. We should break with our government’s subservient support of US aggressive and undemocratic foreign policy exemplified by our shameful participation in the “Lima Group” pretense that Guaido was President of Venezuela, or the illegal kidnapping of Aristide from Haiti. Workers should be demanding that our country be a voice for peace, permanent ceasefire in Gaza, and an end to arms production and sales. We should demand the F-35 contract be killed. We should be making common cause in the defense of all those threatened with US violation of their national sovereignty –  including Mexico, Panama, and Greenland.
  5. International solidarity trumps global greed. “The most effective way for workers to fight back against economic warfare is through international solidarity” – Anthony Marco, president of the Hamilton and District Labour Council. Corporations benefit by playing workers in one country against workers in other countries. Instead of seeing workers in other countries as our competitors for jobs, the first step should be to urgently arrange meetings and discussions between the CLC, the AFL-CIO, and the CTM (Confederación de Trabajadores de México), so we can identify our common interests and make common plans to stand against corporate interests. We need to build common struggles of workers internationally for a living wage, safety and health care, dignity in retirement, and reclaiming of our time through a reduced work week and more vacation time.
  6. Emergency Conventions of the CLC, OFL and other provincial federations of labour should be convened as soon as possible to consider the above program and other proposals and demands. This is necessary so that the workers of Canada can assert our collective voice, and begin mobilizing to back it up by asserting our collective power.

Tony Leah is the author of The Truth About the ’37 Oshawa GM Strike – order your copy from the publisher, Baraka Books.

 

 

 

{ Add a Comment }

Local 222 Financial Secretary “engaged in harassment and violence”

A Unifor investigation into a complaint against Local 222 Financial Secretary, Rob Romano has determined that Romano “engaged in harassment and violence. As such, the complaint is substantiated.”

When this incident occurred on April 7, 2022 word spread rapidly that a retiree had been punched in the chest at a union meeting by the Local’s Financial Secretary. Many members were shocked. However, the administration of the Local denied the story and tried to vilify the victim instead. Their insistence that Rob Romano had been found innocent created uncertainty amongst the membership. However, now that Unifor’s investigation has finally been completed, the truth can be told – Rob Romano did disrupt a union meeting and did indeed push and punch a retired member.

The retiree, Tony Leah, filed a complaint under the Unifor Harassment Policy right after the incident happened, as well as submitting a complaint to the Durham Region Police Service. After investigation, the Durham police arrested Romano and charged him with the criminal offense of assault, however the charge was later withdrawn before trial by the Deputy Crown Attorney. Meanwhile, Unifor assigned the complaint to a human rights Investigator. The report of the Investigator is damning in it’s assessment of Romano’s behaviour.

The incident occurred at a Local 222 general membership meeting on April 7, 2022. Although there was no quorum for a regular meeting, an orderly information meeting was taking place, as is provided for in the Local By-Laws. The Local President gave a report, and was taking questions. Apparently, Romano was determined to prevent the meeting from continuing, and was prepared to go to any lengths to disrupt it. This is how the Investigator’s report describes what happened next, referring to Rob Romano as “the Respondent” and Tony Leah as “the Complainant”:

The evidence supports that the Respondent engaged in violence while at a Unifor Local 222 union meeting on April 7, 2022. The Respondent quickly and aggressively walked over to the microphone where a member was speaking and yelled about there being no quorum and no meeting. The Respondent grabbed the microphone from the stand and subsequently first pushed the Complainant and, more likely than not, punched the Complainant in the chest as he exited the hall. These incidents reasonably represent acts of violence.

The report also has some criticism directed towards the Complainant, Tony Leah, who confronted Romano “while urging him to return the microphone so the member could finish speaking.” Nevertheless, the report states that Leah’s action “does not justify being subsequently pushed or punched by the Respondent.”

The conclusion of the report is clear:

In conclusion, the findings support that the Respondent engaged in behaviours that are tantamount to harassment and violence. This represents a violation of the Unifor Harassment Policy and Unifor Harassment Policy for Union Events.

All Local 222 members should be concerned that an elected official of the Local tried to prevent an orderly meeting from continuing, and tried to prevent the sister who was speaking from being heard. This was an outrageous attempt to prevent free speech and interfere with the union membership’s right to hear information, discuss issues, and hold the leadership to account.

The Local 222 membership should have a right to know what happened, and what were the results of the investigation. This is completely consistent with the commitment to “accountability and transparency” in the Unifor Constitution.

Read the full 4-page report and recommendations at this link.

Romano Was Paid $9040 of Union Funds

After the assault charge against Romano was withdrawn, the Local President, Jeff Gray, took the unprecedented step of asking the Local Executive Board and the Local Retired Workers Chapter to reimburse Romano for his legal bills. This was done even though it was known that the incident was still under investigation by the national union. Gray claimed that Romano had been found “innocent”, but of course the assault charge was never heard in court, so he was never found either innocent or guilty of the that charge. But his behaviour at the meeting was investigated by Unifor, and we now know that the Unifor investigation DID find that he had “engaged in harassment and violence” against a retired member. Nevertheless, the Local President’s supporters on the Local Executive Board voted (although not unanimously) to give Romano $4520 from Local Union Funds. Gray also spoke at a Retired Workers Chapter meeting to urge that the Retirees’ funds be used to reimburse Romano for the other half of his legal bill. Unsurprisingly, there was a large turnout at that Retiree Chapter meeting of supporters of Romano and Jeff Gray, and they narrowly passed the motion.

On February 5, 2024 the Retired Workers Chapter was informed of the results of the Unifor Investigation Report and the findings of Romano’s violations of Unifor’s Harassment Policy. There was vigorous discussion of the issue, and Brother Chris White made the following motion:

I move that the following letter be sent to Rob Romano:

Brother Romano,

On December 5, 2022 a motion was passed at the Retired Workers Chapter meeting to pay half of your legal bill, because it was claimed that you had been found “innocent” of assaulting a retired member.

The National Union has now concluded an extensive and lengthy investigation into charges of violence you committed at the Unifor Local 222 General Membership Meeting on April 7, 2022.

The findings of the Unifor investigation “support that the Respondent [you] engaged in behaviours that are tantamount to harassment and violence. This represents a violation of the Unifor Harassment Policy and Unifor Harassment Policy for Union Events.”

We therefore request that all monies ($4,520) paid to you by Local 222 Retirees Chapter be returned in a timely manner.

There seemed to be support for this motion, but Les MacDonald acted to prevent the members present from making the decision. He made a motion of referral to the Retiree Chapter Executive Board. When Brother MacDonald’s motion was passed it meant that the membership at that meeting could no longer vote on sending the letter. It will now be up to the Retiree Executive to decide on whether or not to support sending a letter to Romano asking him to return the Chapter’s money.

If you have an opinion on whether or not Romano should repay the retirees – please contact any member of the Retiree’s Executive before their meeting on Monday, February 26 to let them know what you would like them to do.

Here are the current members of the Local 222 Retired Workers Chapter Executive: Lyle Hargrove, Doug Sanders, Les MacDonald, Deb Korson, Mike Saunders, Chris White, Lance Livingstone, Don Revoy, Paul Herrington.

{ Add a Comment }

Another chapter in the UNIFOR / Dias crisis

The Taylor Report interviewed Tony Leah on March 28, 2022

Listen on Soundcloud or read the transcript (below):


Phil Taylor follows up on the Jerry Dias Affair with Tony Leah, Political Action Committee Chair of Unifor Local 222 in Oshawa.

According to Leah, Unifor’s “transparency” about the Dias affair has been grudging at best. In fact many important questions remain unanswered, such as:

– Who is Unifor’s “independent” investigator?

– What is the name of the company that gave Dias $50,000 after he promoted their Covid-19 test kits to corporations that bargain with Unifor?

– Why did it take 6 days for Dias’ assistant, Chris MacDonald, to turn over to Unifor’s Secretary-Treasurer the $25,000 in cash that Dias gave him? What discussions occurred between MacDonald, Scott Doherty (another assistant to Dias) and Unifor Ontario Director Naureen Rizvi during those 6 days?

– Did Dias offer anything to the employers who purchased the test kits? Was there a quid pro quo?

Leah noted that Chrysler officials explained that their payoffs to UAW officials in the US were motivated by a desire to secure concessions by keeping those officials “fat, dumb, and happy.” The auto companies have also benefited from concessions and two-tier contracts in Canada. GM was able to shut down vehicle assembly in Oshawa in 2019 and start up again last year with an entirely new workforce earning the much lower starting rate.

Full transcript of the interview:

{ Add a Comment }

Montreal radio host reports on “Jerry Dias Street” reaching a dead end.

Respected publisher, author and commentator Robin Philpot reported on the bizarre spectacle of a union leader asking to have a street in Oshawa named after himself. Philpot, the publisher of Baraka Books, presented the fascinating story to the Francophone audience of his show on Montreal community radio station CKVL on November 10, 2021.

You can listen to the French audio of this episode of “Le pied à Papineau” at this link:

Philpot finds the fitting literary reference for the narcissism of Jerry Dias – the La Fontaine fable of The Frog and the Ox. In the fable, the frog keeps trying to make himself look larger than he is, in a vain attempt to be seen as big and powerful as the ox. The only result, however, is that he puffs himself up until he explodes. As Philpot says, it is clear Jerry Dias hasn’t read the fable.

Here is the English translation of the description of the radio broadcast, followed by the French. The English translation is by DeepL Translate (Google Translate provides a somewhat different and more comical translation).

Jerry Dias, president of UNIFOR, will not see a street named after him in Oshawa. The members of UNIFOR Local 222 don’t want to hear about it and neither does the Oshawa City Council, which voted 9-2 against the proposal.

It’s a funny story if ever there was one, which shows that Jerry hasn’t read Lafontaine’s fable of the frog and the ox.

Basically, it’s the story of a unionist’s all-consuming ambition to be a working class hero while making out with Doug Ford and Justin Trudeau.

Unifor is expelled from the Canadian Labour Congress and all provincial federations of labour, EXCEPT the FTQ, which has sovereignty-association status within the labour movement. Excluded for raiding other unions instead of organizing non-unionized workers.

Despite the great history of the UAW (United Auto Workers), which became the CAW (Canadian Auto Workers) before becoming UNIFOR, the Canadian leadership of UNIFOR seems to have turned its back on the working class and on social democracy for whatever crumbs the political leadership deigns to give them. Hence the rapprochement with the Liberals and Conservatives, including Justin Trudeau and Doug Ford.

So Jerry wanted the City of Oshawa to honour him by naming a city street after him. He had one of his employees, a man named Terry Farrell, make the request. He said, and had people say, that it was Jerry who “saved the plant in Oshawa”.

The members of Local 222 at the GM plant in Oshawa got wind of this. They flooded the city council with messages of disgust and protest. They wanted nothing to do with the proposal.

The view of some members of Unifor Local 222

Check: Jerry Dias did not save the plant. GM ended vehicle production in December 2019. Workers were making $36 an hour at the time. GM decided in 2021 that it would reopen the plant to produce trucks. Workers now earn $23 an hour, a drop of $13. Jerry Dias is responsible for this and other setbacks.

The City Council realized that the idea was unacceptable, rejecting the proposal in a 9-2 vote.

And so Jerry Dias’ dream fizzled, just like that of the frog who wanted to be like the ox in Lafontaine’s fable.

His all-consuming ambition was devoured. (Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator)


Jerry Dias, président du syndicat UNIFOR, ne verra pas une rue à son nom à Oshawa. Les membres de la section locale 222 d’UNIFOR ne veulent rien savoir, le conseil de la ville d’Oshawa non plus, qui a voté contre la proposition à 9 contre 2.

Histoire cocasse s’il en est, qui démontre que Jerry n’a pas lu la fable de Lafontaine de la grenouille et le boeuf.

En gros, c’est l’histoire de l’ambition dévorante d’un syndicaliste qui se prend pour un héros de la classe ouvrière tout en faisant des mamours avec Doug Ford et Justin Trudeau.

L’Unifor est exclu du Congrès du travail du Canada et de toutes les fédérations des travailleuses et travailleurs provinciales, SAUF la FTQ qui jouit d’un statut de souveraineté-association au sein du mouvement syndical. Exclu parce qu’il faisait de maraudage chez d’autres syndicats au lieu d’organiser des travailleuses et des travailleurs non syndiqués.

Malgré la formidable histoire des TUA (Travailleurs unis de l’automobile), devenus les TCA (Travailleurs canadiens de l’automobile) avant de devenir UNIFOR, les dirigeants canadiens d’UNIFOR semblent avoir tourné le dos à la classe ouvrière et à la social-démocratie pour quêter des miettes que les dirigeants politiques daignaient leur donner. D’où le rapprochement avec les Libéraux et les Conservateurs, dont Justin Trudeau et Doug Ford.

Donc Jerry a voulu que la ville d’Oshawa l’honore en donnant son nom à une rue de la ville. Il a fait faire la demande par un de ces employés, un dénommé Terry Farrell. Il disait, et faisait dire, que c’est Jerry qui a « sauvé l’usine à Oshawa ».

Les membres de la section locale 222 de l’usine de GM à Oshawa en ont eu vent. Ils ont submergé le conseil de ville de messages de dégoût et de protestation. Ils ne voulaient rien savoir de cette proposition.

Vérification : Jerry Dias n’a pas sauvé l’usine. GM a mis fin à la production de véhicules en décembre 2019. Les travailleuses et travailleurs gagnaient alors 36$ l’heure. GM a décidé en 2021 qu’elle allait rouvrir l’usine pour produire des camions. Les travailleurs et travailleuses gagnent maintenant 23$ l’heure, une baisse de 13$. C’est Jerry Dias qui est responsable de ce recul et d’autres.

Le Conseil de ville a compris que l’idée était inacceptable, rejetant la proposition dans un vote de 9 à 2.

C’est ainsi qu’a pété le rêve de Jerry Dias, tout comme celui de la grenouille qui voulait être comme le boeuf dans la fable de Lafontaine.

Son ambition dévorante s’est dévorée.

{ Add a Comment }

Linda McQuaig supports call for public ownership of Oshawa plant to produce electric vehicles

Linda McQuaig spoke recently on The Taylor Report, CIUT 89.5 fm, about her new book, The Sport & Prey of Capitalists. Linda’s book is an intriguing and informative exploration of the history of public ownership in Canada, and demolishes the myth that private ownership is always best.

My book is basically the story of privatization … The doctrine that the private sector always does things better – it’s always asserted by the business community with great confidence, but never with any evidence. In fact, there’s no evidence that they always do things better … overall, the evidence is it’s very costly when we turn to them, when we privatize things and hand things over to them. It ends up costing us a fortune … My favorite example is the 407.

Here is what Linda said about GM’s closure of the Oshawa plant: “Rather than shut down this historic plant that was the centre of the automotive industry in Canada, let’s have government take it over and let’s use it to create green production vehicles … which we desperately need as part of a Green New Deal.”

Linda McQuaig – “Let’s have government take it over”

Click here to listen to the full interview on The Taylor Report, which aired on Monday, September 16, 2019, on Soundloud.

{ Add a Comment }

Unifor Local 222 sends message of solidarity to injured Colombian GM workers

General Motors has profited for many years by operating in countries like Colombia where wages are low, where safety standards non-existant, and where governments are anti-union and anti-worker. Many workers at the GM Colmotores plant in Bogota, Columbia have suffered permanent injuries due to the unsafe conditions. GM routinely fires injured workers, and prevents them from getting compensation.

Injured GM workers in Bogoto, Colombia express their solidarity.

Over eight years ago, the Association of Injured Workers and Ex-Workers of General Motors Colmotores (ASOTRECOL) was formed to fight for the rights of these injured workers. Since August 2, 2011 they have maintained a tent encampment in front of the US Embassy in Bogota. They have carried out hunger strikes, sometimes sewing their mouths shut. In the process they have gathered international support, and won some victories. However, there are still many injured workers who have not received justice, and the protest continues.

I made a motion at the Unifor Local 222 membership meeting on September 5 for our Local to send a message of solidarity to the injured workers in Colombia, donate $500 to help them in their struggle, and also send a letter to General Motors demanding that they provide justice. The motion passed. Here are the two letters sent by Local 222 President Colin James based on the membership action. Above is a picture of the appreciative workers in Colombia.

{ Add a Comment }

Electric Vehicle Production is Possible in Oshawa

Green Jobs Oshawa distributed this leaflet at the Unifor Constitutional Convention on Wednesday, August 21. It calls for government action to establish electric vehicle production in Oshawa, under public ownership.

Links to download PDF copies of the leaflet in English and French are at the end of this post.

A PDF of the leaflet is available for download:

Download the English leaflet
Télécharger le dépliant en français

{ Add a Comment }

Unifor Convention – Support Progressive Resolutions

Local 222 (Oshawa) has submitted some very important resolutions to the Unifor Constitutional Convention, which is being held in Quebec City from August 19-23.

These resolutions challenge the Unifor delegates to: 1) support a Workers’ Green New Deal, 2) fight for equal wages, pensions and benefits in legislation and bargaining, and 3) rejoin the CLC.

These resolutions were all raised from the floor and passed by the membership at Local meetings. They were NOT put forward by the Local leadership. In fact, the Local 222 leadership did not put forward any resolutions for the Convention.

If you are a Unifor member, please urge your delegates to support these resolutions.

Workers’ Green New Deal

Equal Wages, Benefits and Pensions

Reaffiliate to the CLC

Resolutions Booklet

These resolutions are R-2, R-5, and R-6. All of the resolutions and constitutional amendments can be found in the Resolutions Booklet.

{ Add a Comment }

Unifor Settlement with GM – Footprint or Toe Tag?

Did Jerry Dias make a deal to save the Oshawa plant, or did he give in and accept GM’s determination to end vehicle production in Oshawa?

Just before Christmas last year, GM announced their intention to close Oshawa, meaning the loss of 5,000 direct jobs involved in the assembly of cars and trucks, with a much larger impact on the community of Oshawa – an overall loss of 20,000 jobs.

5,000 jobs, not 2600

GM claimed that 2,600 jobs were affected when they announced the closure, and the media has used that figure ever since. But GM knew that they were taking jobs away from 5,000 workers whose jobs are directly part of the assembly of vehicles in Oshawa. It has been GM’s deliberate policy over the years to outsource as much of the work as possible to third-party supplier companies – to force wages and benefits down. Now GM will claim no responsibility for those workers when they leave town. Many of those outsourced jobs are right inside the Oshawa plant – building services trades, cleaners, workers who sequence and deliver parts, security, the tire room. Others are nearby – including workers who make foam and manufacture seats, and other parts suppliers. At one time all of those jobs were done by workers who were employed directly by GM, and had the same wages and benefits as other GM assembly workers. Now they make less than second tier assembly workers, have inferior benefits, and most have no pensions. And almost all of them are members of Unifor – but has Jerry done anything for them?

From “Save the Plant” to “Keep a Footprint”

Unifor President Jerry Dias vowed to fight to keep the plant open. He hired an expensive public relations company, whose strategic brilliance included a “Tree of Hope”, and an ad on the Super Bowl broadcast, rather than relying on workers’ actions. After several months, the “fight” became reduced to talks with GM to maintain a “footprint” and save “as many jobs as possible”.

Finally, on May 8, the deal was announced – only 300 jobs would be saved – That is only 6% of the 5,000 jobs left in Oshawa. And 300 is just 1.5% of the 20,000 jobs that were in Oshawa not too long ago. Those 300 jobs will be reserved for direct employees of GM. Senior GM workers will be offered retirement or severance incentives. Workers hired by GM since 2006 fare worse – they only get credit for time worked since 2016 to qualify for incentive packages. For the 2,500 workers at supplier companies the deal provides zero jobs, zero incentive packages, zero severance beyond the bare minimum provided by law. Yet, they are Unifor members too. They are workers too.

Here are some of my impressions of the deal and how it was announced.

The Jerry and Travis Show – the members are the last to know

GM of Canada President Travis Hester shakes hands with Unifor President Jerry Dias in front of a company and union backdrop.

Jerry Dias did not meet with the workers affected by the plant closure to let them know what was in his deal with GM. Instead, he took part in a joint press conference with GM of Canada President Travis Hester on May 8 in downtown Toronto. The backdrop featured the logos of GM and Unifor as though the organizations were partners, and the whole set-up was clearly designed to try to rescue GM’s damaged public image. Jerry was on a first-name basis with Hester, while the workers suffered the indignity of learning about their fate by watching the press conference.

Holding the press conference far away from the workers, who would know how hollow the ‘victory’ was, served a very damaging purpose – it left the public with the false impression that the plant has been saved.

The Good Business Model

Comment by a GM worker.

During the Toronto press conference, Jerry praised GM for promising to keep 300 jobs in Oshawa, and said “I’m content that we have established what I believe to be a business plan for the long term”. The workers in Oshawa who are losing their jobs are a lot less content.

Membership Meetings – Where’s Jerry?

Question by a GM worker.

When meetings were held with the members the next day, on May 9, Jerry Dias did not even bother to show up. That is really adding insult to injury. The post on the right shows the reaction of one Oshawa worker.

The 300 Jobs – Now you see them, now you don’t

It wasn’t until the meetings on May 9 that we got more details about the 300 jobs. The jobs will be in the Oshawa Stamping Plant, a small part of the GM complex, and GM’s only commitment is to have the jobs in place by the end of the 2020 calendar year.  Our leadership expressed faith “that most of them would start … in the second half of the year”. Since vehicle production will be done in December, 2019, this means that people who apply for the 300 stamping jobs could be on layoff for 6 months or more before they start. I asked at the meeting if there was any guarantee that the jobs would last past the expiry of our contract – September 21, 2020. The short answer was “No”, there are no guarantees, of course. When the contract expires, everything has to be renegotiated. If GM announces next year that they have changed their mind, or that “conditions have changed”, there could be no jobs at all.

Why should we trust GM Now?

The deal that has been reached depends on GM’s good will – which means it is worth nothing. GM has promised 300 jobs – but they have until the end of 2020 to deliver them. And that is after the expiry of Unifor’s collective agreement. Why should we take GM’s word now, when we have already seen what their promises in 2016 were worth? This deal provides very little for the 2,500 GM workers. It provides nothing for the 2,500 workers at supplier companies. Most importantly this deal provides nothing for the community – no jobs for the future, and the loss of important manufacturing capacity for Oshawa, Ontario and Canada. GM is already taking inventory of the equipment they are going to take out and relocate or sell.

Demand Public Ownership and a Green Transition

Oshawa Complex. Stamping (in red) – 300 jobs. The rest of the complex, including vehicle production (in black) – zero jobs.

The only realistic way to prevent the dismantling of the Oshawa complex, and the bulldozing of the plant buildings to make space for condos and big box stores, would be for governments to step in and save the manufacturing capacity, and repurpose the plant for electric vehicles, public transit, and renewable energy products. We desperately need that bold action by government anyway to meet the current climate crisis. What better place to start than in Oshawa? If we leave it up to GM, they will put their profits first, and the public interest last. We can’t accept that capitalist cold-hearted logic.

The aerial view shows that GM’s plans will at best keep jobs in a small corner of the Oshawa manufacturing complex – the Stamping Plant outlined in red. All of the automation, robots, technology and equipment used for the assembly of cars and trucks is in the buildings outlined in black – and they will all be empty. We need to force governments to act now, or it will be too late. Can this be done? As veteran union activist Sid Ryan posted recently on Facebook:

One of those alternatives was to push these governments to consider public ownership (nationalise) the Oshawa facility and to repurpose it. After all, the federal and Ontario governments had no problem pumping billions of dollars into GM during the 2008/09 financial disaster brought about by pure greed on Wall St. Why was it ok to hand over taxpayers money to wealthy corporations to enhance their profits in 2008/09 but not do so today to save workers jobs by nationalizing the plant? Furthermore, the federal government had no problem investing in repurposing the Oshawa plants during WWII to churn out military vehicles. Why not now invest in the plant and its workers to design and build electric vehicles, buses and rapid transit systems as just one option?

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers has called for the replacement of the entire Canada Post vehicle fleet with electric vehicles assembled in Canada. That could be the ideal start for a publicly owned manufacturing centre in Oshawa, and the kickstart to a greatly needed Green New Deal.

{ 1 Comment }